Volume 42 Issue 3
Jun.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
FAN Bosong, SHAO Chunfu, ZHAO Dan, MA Sheqiang. Modelling on the Risk Dynamic Evolution of Urban Rail Transit Operation Emergency[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(3): 122-130. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.013
Citation: FAN Bosong, SHAO Chunfu, ZHAO Dan, MA Sheqiang. Modelling on the Risk Dynamic Evolution of Urban Rail Transit Operation Emergency[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(3): 122-130. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.013

Modelling on the Risk Dynamic Evolution of Urban Rail Transit Operation Emergency

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.013
  • Received Date: 2023-12-28
    Available Online: 2024-10-21
  • In order to analyze the dynamic evolution characteristics of urban rail transit operation emergencies, and to explore risk factors affecting normal operations, this paper investigates a dynamic evolution model for such emergencies. The bow-tie model is used to integrate the causes of operational risks, estimated time margins and the severity of the emergencies, developing a risk dynamic model which reflects the operational risk status of urban rail transit systems at different moments. Based on a complex network model, the degree distribution of nodes is improved by introducing connected edge weights and structural hole theory, leading to the development of a risk dynamic evolution model which characterizes risk dynamic modes and their evolution process. Relying on the data from Beijing urban rail transit emergency operations, the research explores the evolution patterns of operation emergencies and identifies significant risk factors. The results show that the risk dynamic evolution model for Beijing urban rail transit operation emergency network exhibits the characteristics of a scale-free network, where 19.90% of risk dynamic modes account for 77.76% of the dynamic evolution process of the whole system. The risk dynamic evolution model demonstrates both robustness and fragility, with"train fulfillment"and"punctuality"identified as risk factors for the"more severe"and"severe"modes, respectively. These few but critical risk factors have significant consequences for the dynamic evolution of the system. Therefore, it is necessary to focus on risk factors that may bring serious consequences, and carry out targeted risk prevention, control and resilience enhancement, according to the dynamic evolution characteristics of the system.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    SHEN S L, ELBAZ K, SHABAN W M, et al. Real-time prediction of shield moving trajectory during tunnelling[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2022, 17(4): 1533-1549. doi: 10.1007/s11440-022-01461-4
    [2]
    YAN H, GAO C, ELZARKA H, et al. Risk assessment for construction of urban rail transit projects[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 118: 583-594. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.042
    [3]
    SINGH R, DANIEL H, DANIEL J. Decomposing journey times on urban metro systems via semiparametric mixed methods[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 114(5): 140-163.
    [4]
    程静, 卢群, 吴同政, 等. 地铁网络级联失效恢复策略韧性评估方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(4): 173-184. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.04.018

    CHENG J, LU Q, WU T Z, et al. A method for evaluating recovery strategies for cascade failures of metro networks[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(4): 173-184. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.04.018
    [5]
    刘朝阳, 吕永波, 刘步实, 等. 城市轨道交通运输网络级联失效抗毁性研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(5): 82-87.

    LIU Z Y, LYU Y B, LIU B S, et al. Cascading failure resistance of urban rail transit network[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(5): 82-87. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    胡立伟, 范仔健, 张苏航, 等. 基于复杂网络的城市交通拥塞因子风险传播机理及其应用研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(2): 224-230.

    HU L W, FAN Z J, ZHANG S H, et al. Risk propagation mechanism and application of urban traffic congestion factors based on complex networks[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(2): 224-230. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    赵振宁. 地铁列车牵引系统动态风险分析评估方法研究[D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2019.

    ZHAO Z N. Research on dynamic risk analysis and evaluation method of metro train traction system[D]. Qingdao: Shandong University of Science and Technology, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    ZHOU Y, LI C, DING L, et al. Combining association rules mining with complex networks to monitor coupled risks[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2019, 186(6), 194-208.
    [9]
    LI X, SUN C. Dynamic risk-warning of center diaphragm and bench composite method during construction[J]. Structural Durability and Health Monitoring, 2022, 16(3): 235-254. doi: 10.32604/sdhm.2022.013141
    [10]
    OMIDVAR M, ZAREI E, RAMAVANDI B, et al. Fuzzy bow-tie analysis: concepts, review, and application[J]. Linguistic Methods Under Fuzzy Information in System Safety and Reliability Analysis, 2022, 414(3): 13-51.
    [11]
    HUGHES P, SHIPP D, FIGUERES E M, et al. From free-text to structured safety management: introduction of a semi-automated classification method of railway hazard reports to elements on a bow-tie diagram[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 110: 11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.011
    [12]
    LI K P, WANG S S. A network accident causation model for monitoring railway safety[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 109: 398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.008
    [13]
    LI Q, SONG L, LIST G F, et al. A new approach to understand metro operation safety by exploring metro operation hazard network(MOHN)[J]. Safety Science, 2017, 93: 50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.10.010
    [14]
    LU Y, LI Q, LU Y. A research on subway physical vulnerability based on network theory and FMECA[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 80: 127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.019
    [15]
    YANG Y, LIU Y, ZHOU M, et al. Robustness assessment of urban rail transit based on complex network theory: a case study of the Beijing Subway[J]. Safety Science, 2015, 79: 149-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.006
    [16]
    李萌. 基于贝叶斯与复杂网络的铁路隧道复杂系统运营期风险评估方法研究[D]. 石家庄: 石家庄铁道大学, 2020.

    LI M. Study on the risk assessment method of railway tunnel complex system based on bayes and complex network[D]. Shijiazhuang: Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    杨起帆. 基于复杂网络理论的地铁灾害链链式传递模型与风险分析[D]. 石家庄: 石家庄铁道大学, 2021.

    YANG Q F. Chain transfer model and risk analysis of metro disaster chain based on complex network theory[D]. Shijiazhuang: Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, 2021. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    YU K, WANG Y, ZHAO W. Safety evaluation system of urban traffic network based on topological genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 38(6), 6825-6832. doi: 10.3233/JIFS-179760
    [19]
    中华人民共和国交通运输部. 城市轨道交通运营安全风险分级管控和隐患排查治理管理办法[R]. 北京: 中华人民共和国交通运输部, 2019.

    Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China. Urban rail transit operation safety risk hierarchical management and control and hidden danger investigation and management measures[R]. Beijing: Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    BURT R S. Structural Holes[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (100) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return