Volume 41 Issue 1
Feb.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHU Zhaoming, CHEN Ruixiang, LIU Jinguang. A Model of Risk Classification and Forewarning for Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Unsignalized Urban Roadways[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(1): 53-61. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.01.006
Citation: CHU Zhaoming, CHEN Ruixiang, LIU Jinguang. A Model of Risk Classification and Forewarning for Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Unsignalized Urban Roadways[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(1): 53-61. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.01.006

A Model of Risk Classification and Forewarning for Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Unsignalized Urban Roadways

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.01.006
  • Received Date: 2022-04-21
    Available Online: 2023-05-13
  • To quantify the collision risk for pedestrian crossing at unsignalized urban roadways, a method for classifying such risk is proposed based on a K-means algorithm, and a forewarning model is also developed based on random forest technique. Three indicators, conflict time difference to conflict, potential collision distance, and potential collision energy, are selected to describe the real-world human-vehicle interactions by considering their temporal and spatial proximity and the severity of potential collisions. A K-means algorithm is applied to cluster the states of pedestrian crossing risk and classify the corresponding risk into different levels. Thirty indicators are proposed by analyzing the potential risk factors from the following five aspects, including weather, traffic facilities, behaviors of traffic participants, historical accidents, and others presented in the process of pedestrian crossing. An optimal set of forewarning indicators is extracted after screening the above indicators according to the Gini purity. Taking the optimal set as the model input, a hierarchical forewarning model which can refine and predict the pedestrian crossing risk is developed by using a random forest algorithm. The accuracy of the model is verified based on three pedestrian crossing datasets collected in a city of Shanxi Province. Experiment results show that quantitative classification is consistent with the real-world pedestrian crossing scenarios when the level of pedestrian crossing risk is divided into 5 levels. The overall accuracy of the hierarchical forewarning model reaches 86.67%. The accuracy of identifying level Ⅰ and level Ⅳ risk are even higher, as their accuracy reaches 100% and 94.7%, respectively. The proposed method also mitigates several issues from the models presented in the previous studies, such as incomplete risk indicators, unrealistic risk classification and unrefined warning level, and improves the accuracy of risk forewarning for pedestrians crossing streets.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    公安部道路交通安全研究中心. 中国大城市道路交通发展研究报告(2020)[R]. 北京: 公安部道路交通安全研究中心, 2021.

    Research Institute for RoadSafety of MPS. Rsearchreport on metropolis'road traffic development in China(2020)[R]. Beijing: Research Institute for Road Safety of MPS, 2021. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    HERNANDEZ D C, FILONENKO A, HARIYONO J, et al. Laser based collision warning system for high conflict vehicle-pedestrian zones[C]. 2016 IEEE 25th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics(ISIE), Santa Clara, USA: IEEE, 2016.
    [3]
    胡鹏程, 张超, 鲍丙计, 等. 基于车载视频的行人预警系统[J]. 计算机与现代化, 2016(11): 43-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2475.2016.11.008

    HU P C, ZHANG C, BAO B J, et al. Pedestrian warning system based on on-board videos[J]. Computer and Modernization, 2016(11): 43-52. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2475.2016.11.008
    [4]
    彭金栓, 张磊, 徐磊, 等. 基于行人动作预判的碰撞预警系统: 201810276866. 3[P]. 2018-03-30.

    PENG J S, ZHANG L, XU L, et al. Collision early warning system based on pedestrian action prediction: 201810276866. 3[P]. 2018-03-30. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    赵彬. 面向车载行人预警系统需求的行人过街意图识别模型研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2021.

    ZHAO B. Research on pedestrian crossing intention recognition model facing the demand of vehicle-mounted pedestrian warningsystem[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2021. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    MOGELMOSE A, TRIVEDI M, MOESLUND T B. Trajectory analysis and prediction for improved pedestrian safety: Integrated framework and evaluations[C]. 2015 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium(Ⅳ), Seoul, South Korea: IEEE, 2015.
    [7]
    LEWIN I, O'FARRELL J. Development and analysis of a pedestrian crossing warning system[J]. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 2000, 29(2): 100-105. doi: 10.1080/00994480.2000.10748322
    [8]
    SISIOPIKU V P, ELLIOTT J R. Active warning systems: Synthesis[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2005, 131(3): 205-210. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:3(205)
    [9]
    HOYE A, LAURESHYN A. SeeMe at the crosswalk: Be-fore-after study of a pedestrian crosswalk warning system[J]. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 2019(60): 723-733.
    [10]
    刘佳丽, 黄世震, 何恩德. 基于ARM和深度学习的智能行人预警系统[J]. 信息技术与网络安全, 2021, 40(12): 60-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WXJY202112010.htm

    LIU J L, HUANG S Z, HE E D. Intelligent pedestrian warning system based on ARM and deep learning[J]. Information Technology and Network Security, 2021, 40(12): 60-64. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WXJY202112010.htm
    [11]
    陈一锴, 胡晶, 李健昌, 等. 1种基于手机APP的行人过街预警系统: 201811490019. 3[P]. 2018-12-06.

    CHEN Y K, HU J, LI J C, et al. A pedestrian crossing warning system based on mobile phone APP: 201811490019. 3[P]. 2018-12-06. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    吴宇通, 张洪昌, 曾娟. 基于车联网的车辆与行人碰撞预警方法研究[J]. 科技与创新, 2020(17): 1-3.

    WU Y C, ZHANG H C, ZENG J. Early warning method of vehicle pedestrian collision based on Internet of vehicles[J]. Science and Technology & Innovation, 2020(17): 1-3. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    裴玉龙, 冯树民. 基于交通冲突的行人过街危险度研究[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2007, 39(2): 285-287. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0367-6234.2007.02.029

    PEI Y L, FENG S M. Study on hazard degree of pedestrians'crossing based on traffic conflict[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2007, 39(2): 285-287. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0367-6234.2007.02.029
    [14]
    项乔君, 卢川, 吴群, 等. 基于冲突严重性划分的公路平交口安全评价[J]. 公路交通科技, 2008, 25(8): 128-131. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200808027.htm

    XIANG Q J, LU C, WU Q, et al. Traffic safety evaluation on highway intersection based on severity division of traffic conflict[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2008, 25(8): 128-131. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLJK200808027.htm
    [15]
    孙林. 基于交通冲突技术的城市交叉口交通安全评价方法研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2015.

    SUN L. Study on evaluation method of urbanintersection traffic safety on traffic conflict technique[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2015. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    向红艳, 张清泉. 无信号控制路段行人过街风险分析模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(4): 126-130.

    XIANG H Y, ZHANG Q Q. Model for evaluating risk of pedestrian in crossing unsignalizedroad[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(4): 126-130. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    袁泉, 晏楠飞, 郝威. 基于心理安全距离的行人风险评价及预警算法研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(1): 109-118. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL202201010.htm

    YUAN Q, YAN N F, HAO W. Pedestrian risk assessment and early warning algorithm based on psychological safety distance[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(1): 109-118. (in Chinese) https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGL202201010.htm
    [18]
    余昕宇. 基于人因分析的无信控过街风险评估及安全改善研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2020.

    YU X Y. Research on risk evaluation and safety improvement of unsignalized crossing sections based on human factor analysis[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    袁黎, 何娟, 蔡明杰, 等. 基于安全熵的信号控制路段行人过街风险评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(8): 25-30.

    YUAN L, HE J, CAI M J, et al. Model forevaluating risk of pedestrian in crossing signalized section based on safety entropy[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(8): 25-30. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    KADALI B R, VEDAGIRI P. Proactive pedestrian safety evaluation at unprotected mid-block crosswalk locations under mixed traffic conditions[J]. Safety Science, 2016(89): 94-105.
    [21]
    ZHANG C B, CHEN F, WEI Y Wei. Evaluation of pedestrian crossing behavior and safety at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks with different numbers of lanes in China[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2019(123): 263-273.
    [22]
    周扬, 付锐, 袁伟, 等. 驾驶人认知分心识别随机森林模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(1): 20-25.

    ZHOU Y, FU R, YUAN W, et al. Researchon drivers cognitive distracted recognition model based on random forest[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(1): 20-25. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(8)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (838) PDF downloads(56) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return